Sometimes “Political Correctness” Just Means Seeing People for Who They Are

My neighbor and I have been friends for 30 years. I have no doubt that she holds me to a high regard, as I do her. But when she asked me if I had a hard time being “crippled,” I literally felt a chill run through my body. 
 
I have MS, and I use a cane or walker to get around. In my mind, that does not make me “crippled.” But even if I was unable to walk at all without a mobility device, I would still feel uncomfortable being referred to by that term. It conjures up an image of helplessness that is not only inaccurate, but robs me of my dignity. 
 
Am I being overly sensitive? Perhaps. And it fortunately doesn’t really matter in this case, because I know her and where she’s coming from.   
 
But in being uncomfortable, am I also trying to be “politically correct?” These days, those are fighting words. The phrase can mean a lot of things, but it is now often used to poke fun at people who are trying to be attentive to diversity and sensitive about how hurtful words can be. 
 
Let’s take a closer look at some of the emerging language that is meant to cast a less-judgmental light on people with disabilities. Call it “politically correct” if you must, but please don’t let that phrase keep you from seeing the broader purpose here.  
 
If I describe someone as “wheelchair-bound,” I am instantly (if inadvertently) defining them by what they can’t do. If, by contrast, I refer to the individual as a “wheelchair user,” that is simply stating a fact without conjuring up a pitiful or judgmental image. 
 
There is often no need to describe a person by first referring to their disability (“That wheelchair-using student won the spelling bee.”). This is why people with disabilities advocate for “people first” language: Identify the person before you identify their disability. And just as with race, it’s frequently unnecessary to refer to their disability at all. 
 
These may seem like trivial issues, but it is our common discourse that helps mold the self-image of the people we are talking about. And for me and most of the people with disabilities that I know, we would like to be thought of first as who we are, not what we have.  
  
For more information, click here. 
Tags Activism & Advocacy      3 Appreciate this
| Reply
Helen

Helen Russon

Helen Russon is an (inactive) attorney who teaches disability law and has investigated many civil rights cases with the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries. She has also written many articles on disability issues and done other volunteer work with her local chapter. As a person living with MS, Helen wants to share both her expertise and experience. She is careful to emphasize, however, that nothing she writes is intended to be legal advice. It is general information to help point readers in the right direction.

Leave a Comment

Thanks for sharing your thoughts with the MSconnection.org community. Please note comments are moderated.

    3 Comments

  • Margaret Kiser   Aug 5, 2019 11:05 PM
    I prefer to name those displaying through me, not as disabilities, but as "DIFFERENT abilities"; because my challenges create unique strengths, which some normal-bodied folks struggle to perform.
    E.g.: patience to overlook another's 'faults', all of which declare our humanity before our diety.
  • helen russon   Aug 6, 2019 6:56 PM
    Thanks for your email, Margaret. Very well put!
  • Deborah Ramsey   Aug 12, 2019 5:48 AM
    I always make it fun when I describe my wheelchair. I am a wheelchair user but I refer to the wheelchair as my Chariot and when people get tired of standing I let them now I never have that problem because I bring a chair wherever I go